What this page shows
The FTC's Rite Aid proceeding addressed alleged failures to prevent harm when facial recognition was used in stores. A separate December 2024 IntelliVision action challenged the substantiation of accuracy, bias and anti-spoofing claims.
Together, these cases suggest a two-part procurement question: does the vendor have reliable evidence for its claims, and does the customer's deployment prevent harmful outcomes? Passing a laboratory benchmark would not, alone, answer the second question.
Recorded evidence
Limitations & review notes
- Research draft. Conclusions may change; review the sources and limitations before relying on them.
- Research draft: not independently verified and not actively monitored. This is a dated research lead, not a verified conclusion.
- This is a comparison of separate cases, not a supplier relationship: the sources do not establish that IntelliVision supplied Rite Aid. The December IntelliVision announcement describes allegations and a proposed settlement.
SuperSmart← Back to DiscoverDiscover